#Viewing raws in corel aftershot standard pro
#Viewing raws in corel aftershot standard software
#Viewing raws in corel aftershot standard trial
#Viewing raws in corel aftershot standard free

#Viewing raws in corel aftershot standard pro

I'm sure they would sharpen up nicely in Photoshop (or in AfterShot Pro 3 itself).ĪfterShot Pro 3 on left, Olympus Viewer 3 on right.Ībove is a good example of the differences between the two programmes indicated thus far. Now some may argue that this is exactly how an unedited Tiff should look - with absolutely no sharpening applied whatsoever. The AP3 files, in comparison, look very soft - almost to the point of being blurry. This brings the OV3 files almost exactly in-line with the Lightroom files in terms of sharpness. I've already talked about the sharpness that Olympus dial into their conversions by default (see previous post), so I made sure that I was using the OV3 files that had -2 Sharpening, -2 Contrast and -2 Saturation applied. What's perhaps not as apparent is the lack of sharpness in the AfterShot Pro 3 files. Even the white of the boat looks 'cleaner' in the OV3 rendered file. The colours in OV3 are a far more accurate representation. AP3 makes it look (and feel) like it was taken on an early autumn morning, when in reality it was taken on a cold winters afternoon. The warm cast is very obvious when looking at the example above. The 'warmer' colour cast in AP3 is evident. This bias towards warmer, reddy/yellow colours was to continue through all the AP3 files when compared to the Olympus (and Lighroom) conversions.ĪfterShot Pro 3 on left, Olympus Viewer 3 on right. It's not horrible - just noticeably more warmer/yellow in the AP3 Tiff. I call it a 'cast' because I believe the Olympus file to be a more accurate representation of the colours in the scene. Immediately noticeable between the two files is the warmer colour cast apparent in the AfterShot Pro 3 file. I then opened them in OV3's Lightbox so I could compare the AP3 file against the OV3 file side by side.

orf RAW files in AP3 (by pointing them to the correct folder on the HDD), and then saved them out as a 16 bit Tiff file with no modifications to the file whatsoever. For the purposes of this test, I simply opened the Olympus. It reminds me less of Lightroom and more of Apple's Aperture (which is a good thing as far as I'm concerned). The UI for AP3 is very impressive - clean, quick and fairly intuitive to use.

#Viewing raws in corel aftershot standard software

So they are no slouches when it comes to software development, and I had high hopes for AfterShot Pro 3.Ĭorel's AfterShot Pro 3 Tiff on the left and Olympus Viewer 3 Tiff on right I started out using CorelDraw before Adobe's Illustrator and InDesign became the industry standards, and PaintShop Pro looks like a serious contender against Photoshop. Corel are a very respected name in the graphic industry. They also highlight its compatibility with Adobe Photoshop, as well as their own PaintShop Pro. Indeed, Corel are marketing AP3 as the world's fastest RAW photo editor - up to 4x faster than Adobe Lightroom. And may signal a serious intention by Corel to really go after Adobe in the Photography software sector? If I remember correctly, Corel purchased Bibble, and this formed the basis of Aftershot? Many complained that Corel didn't really do anything with the software other than repackage it, and has let it languish for quite a while.

#Viewing raws in corel aftershot standard free

You can't get much cheaper than free - right?Īt $95NZ currently for Corel's Aftershot Pro 3 (AP3), it won't break the bank for a fully featured RAW conversion solution.

Of course the great benefit of OV3 is that it comes free with my camera. So I would like to find something else that I can use/purchase outright. I should also re-state for the record that the whole purpose of this search was to move away from being reliant on the subscription-based software plan that Adobe now enforces on users. So I wanted to try a few more options for RAW conversions before settling on my programme of choice. It's reasonably intuitive, but very slow, clunky, and lacks a lot of the more refined selection and adjustment options of other products.

I was, and still am, impressed with Olympus's proprietary software, and believe it gives a superior result with less effort, especially in colour accuracy.īut for all its good points, OV3 isn't the slickest software on the planet. In my last two posts, I pitted Olympus's free RAW conversion software - Viewer 3 (OV3), up against Adobe Lightroom CC (version 2015.4).

#Viewing raws in corel aftershot standard trial

The great thing about deciding on new software is that you can usually download a fully functioning trial for a month to 'try before you buy'.